ADDENDUM
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03025
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
_
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 1 Feb 12 be removed from the
Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).
________________________________________________________________
_
RESUME OF CASE:
On 15 Feb 13, the Board for Corrections of Military Records
(BCMR) considered and denied the applicants request to remove
his FA test, dated 1 Feb 12, from his records. For an
accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the
applicants request; and, the rationale of the earlier decision
by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit E
(with Exhibits A and E). Refer to the Statement of Facts in the
original ROP for the applicants military history and medical
issue at Exhibit F.
By letter, dated 1 Mar 13 (received on 7 Aug 13), he submits a
request for reconsideration stating that he provides AF Form
108, Physical Fitness Education and Intervention Processing,
signed by the medical provider on 14 Jun 13 and indorsed by his
unit commander on 17 Jun 13, noting the member would have
qualified for an abdominal circumference exemption since he is
less than the minimum acceptable of 39 and failed only because
of temporary orthopedic conditions.
His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit F.
________________________________________________________________
_
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice warranting
partial relief. Based on the medical documentation submitted in
support of his appeal, his records should be corrected to
reflect he was exempt him from the abdominal circumference
portion of the FA test in question. We took note of the
applicants request to have the entire FA removed; however, we
believe our recommended relief provides the applicant proper and
fitting relief. We note that as a result of our proposed
corrective action, the applicants composite score will result
in an overall composite score of 100 and a fitness level rating
of EXCELLENT. Therefore, we recommend the applicants record
be corrected as indicated below.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the
Fitness Assessment, dated 1 February 2012, be amended in the Air
Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS) to reflect that he was
exempt from the abdominal circumference component.
________________________________________________________________
_
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-03025 in Executive Session on 1 May 14, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence for Docket Number BC-2012-03025 was
considered:
Exhibit E. Record of Proceedings, dated 16 Apr 14.
Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, dated 1 Mar 14, w/atch.
Panel ChairAF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05596
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05596 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Fitness Assessments (FA), dated 11 Jun 12 and 6 Sep 12, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). While we note the applicants stated request to have the entire FA removed, the Air Force office of primary responsibility has...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05000
DPSIM further recommends the fitness assessments dated 27 Sep 11, 30 Dec 11, and 28 Mar 12 be corrected to reflect the applicant was exempt from the waist measurement component of these FAs. The complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He was told he had to participate in the abdominal circumference for the 29 Mar 11 FA, not knowing there was an AF Form 422...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01944
The updated AFFMS record indicates applicant continued to achieve unsatisfactory scores due to a composite score of 69.5 on both contested FAs. The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 5 Nov 13 70.00 Unsatisfactory 29 May 13 81.5 Satisfactory 27 Jul 12 Exempt Exempt *30 May 12 69.5 (corrected) Unsatisfactory *2 Mar 12 69.5 (corrected) Unsatisfactory * Contested FA On 16 Dec 13, the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board corrected the AFFMS records to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02738
As a result we have concluded that the recorded AC scores are not an accurate reflection of applicant's abdominal circumference. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachment, was forwarded to the applicant on 6 Dec 13 for review and comment within 30 days. The applicant has provided documentation validating he had a medical condition that affected his ability to pass the AC...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05794
In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, to determine overall fitness, the Air Force uses an overall composite fitness score and minimum scores per three component areas: Aerobic Fitness (1.5 mile run), Body Composition (abdominal circumference measurement), and Muscular Fitness (number of push-ups and sit- ups completed within one minute each). On 24 Aug 12, an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, was issued which restricted the applicant from performing activities that...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05794
In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, to determine overall fitness, the Air Force uses an overall composite fitness score and minimum scores per three component areas: Aerobic Fitness (1.5 mile run), Body Composition (abdominal circumference measurement), and Muscular Fitness (number of push-ups and sit- ups completed within one minute each). On 24 Aug 12, an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, was issued which restricted the applicant from performing activities that...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01210
The applicant’s commander, by letter dated 14 Mar 12, requests the applicant’s 28 Feb 12 FA score be removed from his records or nullified. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial to remove the applicant’s 28 Feb 12 FA score from the AFFMS. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05096
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05096 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her 31 Aug 12 Fitness Assessment (FA) be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicants last five FA results are as follows: Date Composite Score Rating 30 Nov 12 88.00 Satisfactory* 31 Aug...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01762
On 24 Nov 2013, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to Insufficient evidence to support contention. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of removal of the 4 Oct 11 FA, due to insufficient evidence to support the applicants contention. Her records were administratively corrected to show that she was exempt from participating in the 7 Feb 12 FA, due to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01360
On 24 Nov 2013, a similar request was considered and denied by the Fitness Assessments Appeals Board (FAAB) due to Insufficient evidence to support contention. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of removal of the 4 Oct 11 FA, due to insufficient evidence to support the applicants contention. Her records were administratively corrected to show that she was exempt from participating in the 7 Feb 12 FA, due to...